氮化硅陶瓷在牙科种植体方向的应用前景

doi:10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.06.011

口腔疾病防治 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 449-452.DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.06.011

氮化硅陶瓷在牙科种植体方向的应用前景

邹蓉芳¹^,²(), 赖璇³, 邓斌²()

1.解放军医学院,北京（100853）
2.解放军总医院第一医学中心口腔科,北京（100853）
3.南方医科大学口腔医院修复科,广东广州（510280）

收稿日期:2021-07-17 修回日期:2022-03-01 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-04-15
通讯作者: 邓斌
作者简介:邹蓉芳,医师,硕士,Email： 842949795@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51872331)

Application prospect of silicon nitride ceramics in dental implants

ZOU Rongfang¹^,²(), LAI Xuan³, DENG Bin²()

1. Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China
2. Department of Stomatology, the 1st Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
3. Department of Prosthodontics, Stomatological Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China

Received:2021-07-17 Revised:2022-03-01 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-04-15
Contact: DENG Bin
Supported by:
grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China(51872331)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

氮化硅断裂韧性高,抗压强度与人体骨相似,可以满足种植体的基本力学要求,氮化硅具有良好的生物相容性,氮化硅表面的微米/纳米级形貌赋予其良好的成骨和抗菌性能,有助于降低种植体周围炎的发生率,因此,氮化硅在牙科种植体方面具有很好的应用潜力。在骨科,氮化硅植入物已应用于脊柱修复和关节植入术,但氮化硅作为牙科种植体材料的相关研究还比较匮乏。对不同烧结助剂、烧结工艺制备的氮化硅生物陶瓷成骨性、抗菌性能的评价和氮化硅对不同口内优势致病菌的抑制作用以及氮化硅材料植入颌骨后的成骨活性和抗菌性能均有待进一步研究。本文结合国内外最新的研究成果,对氮化硅陶瓷在牙科种植体方向的应用前景作一综述。

关键词: 氮化硅, 生物陶瓷, 生物相容性, 牙科种植体, 人体植入物, 表面形貌, 表面性能, 抗菌性, 成骨性

Abstract:

Silicon nitride has high fracture toughness and compressive strength similar to human bone. It meets the basic mechanical requirements of implants and has good biocompatibility. The micrometer/nanometer morphology surface characteristics of silicon nitride give it good osteogenic activity and antibacterial properties, which are helpful to reduce the incidence of periimplant inflammation. Therefore, silicon nitride has good application potential in dental implants. In orthopedics, silicon nitride implants have been used in spine repair and joint implantation. However, there is a lack of research on silicon nitride as dental implant material. The evaluation of the osteogenic and antibacterial properties of silicon nitride bioceramics prepared using different sintering additives and sintering processes, the antibacterial properties of silicon nitride on different dominant oral pathogens, and the osteogenic activity and antibacterial properties of silicon nitride materials implanted into the jaw need to be further studied. Combined with the latest research results at home and abroad, this review discusses the application potential of silicon nitride materials in dentistry.

Key words: silicon nitride, bioceramic, biocompatibility, dental implants, human implantation, surface morphology, surface performance, antibacterial activity, osteogenic activity

中图分类号:

邹蓉芳, 赖璇, 邓斌. 氮化硅陶瓷在牙科种植体方向的应用前景[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2022, 30(6): 449-452.

ZOU Rongfang, LAI Xuan, DENG Bin. Application prospect of silicon nitride ceramics in dental implants[J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2022, 30(6): 449-452.

参考文献 27

[1]	Das M, Bhimani K, Balla VK. In vitro tribological and biocompatibility evaluation of sintered silicon nitride[J]. Mater Lett, 2018, 212:130-133. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.10.061. DOI URL
[2]	Neumann A, Reske T, Held M, et al. Comparative investigation of the biocompatibility of various silicon nitride ceramic qualities in vitro[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2004, 15(10):1135-1140. doi: 10.1023/B:JMSM.0000046396.14073.92. DOI URL
[3]	Mobbs RJ, Rao PJ, Phan K, et al. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using reaction bonded silicon nitride implants: long-term case series of the first synthetic anterior lumbar interbody fusion spacer implanted in humans[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 120:256-264. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.237. DOI URL
[4]	Dai Y, Guo H, Chu L, et al. Promoting osteoblasts responses in vitro and improving osteointegration in vivo through bioactive coating of nanosilicon nitride on polyetheretherketone[J]. J Orthop Translat, 2020, 24:198-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2019.10.011. DOI URL
[5]	Boschetto F, Adachi T, Horiguchi S, et al. In situ molecular vibration insights into the antibacterial behavior of silicon nitride bioceramic versus gram-negative Escherichia coli[J]. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc, 2019, 223:117299. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2019.117299. DOI
[6]	Hu X, Mei S, Wang F, et al. A microporous surface containing Si(3)N(4)/Ta microparticles of PEKK exhibits both antibacterial and osteogenic activity for inducing cellular response and improving osseointegration[J]. Bioact Mater, 2021, 6(10):3136-3149. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.027. DOI
[7]	Pezzotti G. Silicon nitride: a bioceramic with a gift[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11(30):26619-26636. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b07997. DOI URL
[8]	Bock RM, Jones EN, Ray DA, et al. Bacteriostatic behavior of surface modulated silicon nitride in comparison to polyetheretherketone and titanium[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2017, 105(5):1521-1534. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35987. DOI URL
[9]	Ge J, Wang F, Xu Z, et al. Influences of niobium pentoxide on roughness, hydrophilicity, surface energy and protein absorption, and cellular responses to PEEK based composites for orthopedic applications[J]. J Mater Chem B, 2020, 8(13):2618-2626. doi: 10.1039/c9tb02456e. DOI URL
[10]	Webster TJ, Patel A, Rahaman MN, et al. Anti-infective and osteointegration properties of silicon nitride, poly(ether ether ketone), and titanium implants[J]. Acta Biomater, 2012, 8(12):4447-4454. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.038. DOI PMID
[11]	Kersten R, Wu G, Pouran B, et al. Comparison of polyetheretherketone versus silicon nitride intervertebral spinal spacers in a caprine model[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2019, 107(3):688-699. DOI URL
[12]	Calvert GC, Vanburen H 3rd, Rambo WJ, et al. Clinical outcomes for lumbar fusion using silicon nitride versus other biomaterials[J]. J Spine Surg, 2020, 6(1):33-48. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.12.11. DOI PMID
[13]	Beck GR Jr, Ha SW, Camalier CE, et al. Bioactive silica-based nanoparticles stimulate bone-forming osteoblasts, suppress bone-resorbing osteoclasts, and enhance bone mineral density in vivo[J]. Nanomedicine, 2012, 8(6):793-803. doi: 10.1016/j.nano, 2011, 8(6): 793-803. DOI
[14]	Pezzotti G, Marin E, Adachi T, et al. Incorporating Si3N4 into PEEK to produce antibacterial, osteocondutive, and radiolucent spinal implants[J]. Macromol Biosci, 2018, 18(6):201800033. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201800033. DOI
[15]	Sainz M, Serena S, Belmonte M, et al. Protein adsorption and in vitro behavior of additively manufactured 3D-silicon nitride scaffolds intended for bone tissue engineering[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2020, 115:110734. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110734. DOI
[16]	Rautray TR, Narayanan R, Kim KH. Ion implantation of titanium based biomaterials[J]. Prog Mater Sci, 2011, 56(8):1137-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci. DOI URL
[17]	Boyan BD, Lossdörfer S, Wang L, et al. Osteoblasts generate an osteogenic microenvironment when grown on surfaces with rough microtopographies[J]. Eur Cell Mater, 2003, 6:22-27. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v006a03. DOI PMID
[18]	Xu Z, Wu H, Wang F, et al. A hierarchical nanostructural coating of amorphous silicon nitride on polyetheretherketone with antibacterial activity and promoting responses of rBMSCs for orthopedic applications[J]. J Mater Chem B, 2019, 7(39):6035-6047. doi: 10.1039/c9tb01565e. DOI URL
[19]	Pezzotti G, Adachi T, Boschetto F, et al. Off-stoichiometric reactions at the cell-substrate biomolecular interface of biomaterials: in situ and ex situ monitoring of cell proliferation, differentiation, and bone tissue formation[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(17):4080. doi: 10.3390/ijms20174080. DOI URL
[20]	Pezzotti G, Bock RM, Mcentire BJ, et al. Silicon nitride bioceramics induce chemically driven lysis in porphyromonas gingivalis[J]. Langmuir, 2016, 32(12):3024-3035. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00393. DOI URL
[21]	Zanocco M, Boschetto F, Zhu W, et al. 3D-additive deposition of an antibacterial and osteogenic silicon nitride coating on orthopaedic titanium substrate[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2020, 103:103557. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103557. DOI
[22]	Ishikawa M, De MK, Mcentire BJ, et al. Surface topography of silicon nitride affects antimicrobial and osseointegrative properties of tibial implants in a murine model[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2017, 105(12):3413-3421. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36189. DOI URL
[23]	Wu J, Liu YJ, Zhang H, et al. silicon nitride as a potential candidate for dental implants: osteogenic activities and antibacterial properties[J]. J Mater Res, 2021, 36(9):1866-1882. doi: 10.1557/s43578-021-00249-8. DOI URL
[24]	Rahaman M, Xiao W. Silicon nitride bioceramics in healthcare[J]. Int J Appl Ceram Technol, 2017, 15(3):766-774. doi: 10.1111/ijac.12835. DOI URL
[25]	Liu HW, Wei DX, Deng JZ, et al. Combined antibacterial and osteogenic in situ effects of a bifunctional titanium alloy with nanoscale hydroxyapatite coating[J]. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol, 2018, 46(sup3):S460-S470. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1499662. DOI URL
[26]	Pakharukova N, Tuittila M, Paavilainen S, et al. Structural basis for acinetobacter baumannii biofilm formation[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2018, 115(21):5558-5563. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800961115. DOI PMID
[27]	Boschetto F, Toyama N, Horiguchi S, et al. In vitro antibacterial activity of oxide and non-oxide bioceramics for arthroplastic devices: II. fourier transform infrared spectroscopy[J]. Analyst, 2018, 143(9):2128-2140. doi: 10.1039/c8an00234g. DOI URL

氮化硅陶瓷在牙科种植体方向的应用前景

Application prospect of silicon nitride ceramics in dental implants

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 27

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	邓文振, 田徐腾越, 李雪微, 董伟, 梁永强. 醋酸氯己定复合介孔二氧化硅改性正畸粘接树脂的体外研究[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2022, 30(3): 178-184.
[2]	范东阳,王强,周怡君,李斯文,冯旭,刘春冉,崔家森,孙宏晨. 抗菌钛合金在口腔医学中应用研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(4): 284-288.
[3]	曹丽,张宁,白玉兴. 新型抗菌性Hawley保持器的机械强度及抑制菌斑生物膜活性的作用[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2020, 28(8): 499-505.
[4]	曹志炜,杨雨青,周陶,巫佩瑶,解亮. 微量元素改性钛种植体表面研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2020, 28(2): 107-111.
[5]	连克乾,张昕,周捷宇,廖燕芬,司姗姗. 骨髓间充质细胞在聚醚醚酮片和纯钛片表面的体外生物相容性比较[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2020, 28(2): 73-78.
[6]	焦阳,陈吉华. 季铵盐化合物在生物医学材料中的应用进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2019, 27(5): 280-286.
[7]	曾永发,付玉林,戴群,石连水. 3Y-TZP陶瓷表面镧掺杂TiO₂薄膜的制备和抗菌性能研究[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2019, 27(3): 153-158.
[8]	邱滢,李祥伟. 牙髓切断术与冠髓再生的研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2019, 27(12): 813-816.
[9]	冯靓婧(综述), 于皓, 程辉(审校). 不同染色方法对氧化锆陶瓷性能的影响[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2018, 26(5): 334-337.
[10]	丁祥龙,王敬旭,郭泽鸿,赖春花,高岩,林曦,徐淑兰. RGD肽段修饰TiO₂纳米管对MG63成骨细胞黏附增殖能力的影响[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2018, 26(11): 706-711.
[11]	孙妍综述, 邹玲审校. 新型钙硅材料在活髓保存治疗中的研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2018, 26(1): 56-60.
[12]	李文妙综述, 朴正根审校. 氢氧化钙封药载体的研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2017, 25(3): 192-195.
[13]	李振霞, 陈婷婷, 李沛霖, 薛晶, 张强. 纳米羟基磷灰石对托槽粘接剂抗菌性及粘接强度的影响[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2017, 25(2): 93-96.
[14]	陈江,周麟. 种植体颈部设计的研究现状[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2016, 24(8): 441-444.
[15]	刘海霞,陈璇,邹玲. 两种盖髓材料的体外抗菌性能研究[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2016, 24(10): 578-581.