数字化种植导板在口腔种植修复中的应用

doi:10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2019.05.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

数字化种植导板使“以修复为导向”的种植修复方式成为现实,可将种植体设计在理想位点上,最大限度地利用现有牙槽骨,增加修复效果的可预期性。本文就数字化导板分类、数字化导板精确性的相关影响因素作一综述,以期为临床医生实际应用时提供参考依据。数字化导板根据固位方式可分为黏膜支持式、骨支持式、牙支持式、混合支持式。数字化种植导板的制作和使用涉及数据采集、种植导板设计与制作、外科引导手术等一系列过程,其精确性取决于从数据集采集到手术过程中所涉及的所有累积和交互误差。可以根据导板制作与种植体植入过程,从各个方面来减小误差,从而提高导板应用的精确性。

关键词: 口腔种植, 数字化种植导板, 精确性, 3D打印技术, 多层计算机断层扫描, 实时导航

Abstract:

Digital implant guides have enabled "repair-oriented" implant restoration to become a reality by allowing an implant to be designed for an ideal site, maximizing the use of existing alveolar bone, and increasing the predictability of the restorative effect. This paper reviews the classification of digital guides and the related factors affecting the accuracy of digital guides to provide a reference for clinical doctors in practical applications. Digital guides can be divided into the categories of mucosal support, bone support, dental support and mixed support according to the retention mode. The manufacture and use of digital implant guides involve a series of processes, such as data acquisition, design and manufacture of the implant guide, and guided surgery. The accuracy of digital implant guides depends on all accumulated and interactive errors involved in the process from data acquisition to surgery. According to the process of guide plate fabrication and implant placement, errors in all aspects can be reduced to improve the accuracy of guide plate application.

Key words: Oral implant, CAD/CAM surgical guide, Accuracy, 3D printing technology, Multislice computed tomography, Real time navigation

中图分类号:

R783.4

刘子燕,戴群,肖芳. 数字化种植导板在口腔种植修复中的应用[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2019, 27(5): 337-340.

LIU Ziyan,DAI Qun,XIAO Fang. Application of digital implant guide plate in oral implant restoration[J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2019, 27(5): 337-340.

参考文献 29

[1]	Hultin M, Svensson KG, Trulsson M . Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012,23(Suppl 6):124-135.
[2]	Rivara F, Lumetti S, Calciolari E , et al. Photogrammetric method to measure the discrepancy between clinical and software-designed positions of implants[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016,115(6):703-711.
[3]	Dandekeri SS, Sowmya MK, Bhandary S . Stereolithographic surgical template: a review[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2013,7(9):2093-2095.
[4]	Moslehifard E, Nokar S . Designing a custom made gauge device for application in the access hole correction in the dental implant surgical guide[J]. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 2012,12(2):123-129.
[5]	Nickenig HJ, Eitner S . An alternative method to match planned and achieved positions of implants, after virtual planning using cone-beam CT data and surgical guide templates -- a method reducing patient radiation exposure (part I)[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2010,38(6):436-440.
[6]	Shaheen E, Alhelwani A, Casteele ED , et al. Evaluation of dimensional changes of 3D printed models after sterilization: a pilot study[J]. Open Dent J, 2018,12:72-79.
[7]	Devico G, Ferraris F, Arcuri L , et al. A novel workflow for computer guided implant surgery matching digital dental casts and CBCT scan[J]. Oral Implantol (Rome), 2016,9(1):33-48.
[8]	Kuehl S, Payer M, Zitzmann NU , et al. Technical accuracy of printed surgical templates for guided implant surgery with the coDiagnostiX (TM) software[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015,17(1):e177-e182.
[9]	Colombo M, Mangano C, Mijiritsky E , et al. Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: a critical review based on randomized controlled trials[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2017,17(1):150.
[10]	Cassetta M, Giansanti M, Di Mambro AA . Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014,29(5):1071-1078.
[11]	Yatzkair G, Cheng AL, Brodie S , et al. Accuracy of computer-guided implantation in a human cadaver model[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015,26(10):1143-1149.
[12]	Cassetta M, Giansanti M, Di Mambro A , et al. Accuracy of two stereolithographic surgical templates: a retrospective study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2013,15(3):448-459.
[13]	Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE , et al. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009,67(2):394-401.
[14]	Turbush SK, Turkyilmaz I . Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2012,108(3):181-188.
[15]	Geng W, Liu CY, Su YC , et al. Accuracy of different types of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guides for dental implant placement[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015,8(6):8442-8449.
[16]	Kühl S, Zürcher S, Mahid T , et al. Accuracy of full guided vs. half-guided implant surgery[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013,24(7):763-769.
[17]	Matta RE, Bergauer B, Adler WA , et al. The impact of the fabrication method on the three-dimensional accuracy of an implant surgery template[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2017,45(6):804-808.
[18]	Cristache CM, Gurbanescu S . Accuracy evaluation of a stereolithographic surgical template for dental implant insertion using 3D superimposition protocol[J]. Int J Dent, 2017: 4292081.
[19]	Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY , et al. Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: a comparison of operator experience[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015,114(3):407-413.
[20]	Tan P, Layton DM, Wise SL . In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, implant studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2018,21(2):87-95.
[21]	Raico Gallardo YN , Teixeira Da Silva-Olivio IR,Mukai E , et al . Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017,28(5):602-612.
[22]	Rios HF, Borgnakke WS, Benavides E . The use of cone-beam computed tomography in management of patients requiring dental implants: an American academy of periodontology best evidence review[J]. J Periodontol, 2017,88(10):946-959.
[23]	Widmann G, Fischer B, Berggren JP , et al. Cone beam computed tomography vs multislice computed tomography in computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture guided implant surgery based on three-dimensional optical scanning and stereolithographic guides: does image modality matter?[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2016,31(3):527-533.
[24]	Arcuri L, De Vico G, Ottria L , et al. Smart fusion vs. double scan: a comparison between two data-matching protocols for a computer guided implant planning[J]. Clin Ter, 2016,167(3):55-62.
[25]	Younes F, Cosyn J, De Bruyckere T , et al. A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2018,45(6):721-732.
[26]	Bell CK, Sahl EF, Kim YJ , et al. Accuracy of implants placed with surgical guides: thermoplastic versus 3D printed[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2018,38(1):113-120.
[27]	Peng YT, Tseng CC, Du YC , et al. A novel conversion method for radiographic guide into surgical guide[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017,19(3):447-457.
[28]	Lee DH . Strategic use of microscrews for enhancing the accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery in fully edentulous arches: a case history report[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2018,31(3):262-263.
[29]	郭磊, 杨倞, 王远勤 . 上颌后牙区数字化导板引导下倾斜种植精确性研究[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2017,25(7):435-438. DOI URL