青少年骨性Ⅱ类错颌功能矫形疗效的影响因素

doi:10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2020.02.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

功能矫形是临床上治疗青少年骨性Ⅱ类错颌畸形的重要手段之一。深刻认识影响功能矫形疗效的众多因素可以提高矫治效率,取得良好的矫治效果。本文从患者和矫治器两个方面出发,分析影响骨性Ⅱ类错颌功能矫形疗效的因素,深度解析功能矫治器的治疗机制,以期指导临床治疗。文献复习结果表明:生长发育高峰期是治疗骨性 Ⅱ类错畸形患者的最佳时期;对于垂直生长型的患者,推荐使用高位头帽牵引的功能矫治器,防止下颌后下旋转,钛板或种植钉辅助支抗的功能矫治器可以有效减小下前牙唇倾;此外,相较传统功能矫治器,数字化、个性化的透明牙套矫治器不仅更美观、舒适、利于牙周健康,且还有双期融合、更佳的切牙转矩和后牙垂直向控制以及前导的同时解决前牙干扰和横向不足问题等诸多优点。随着数字化正畸的发展,透明矫治器已成为功能矫治器的重要发展方向,但相关研究较少,需要更多的临床研究来证实其疗效。

关键词: 青少年, 骨性Ⅱ类, 错颌畸形, 生长发育高峰期, 功能矫治器, 透明牙套矫治器, 生长型, 支抗, 数字化, 牙周健康

Abstract:

Functional orthodontics is one of the most important methods in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adolescents. A deep understanding of the many factors affecting the effect of functional orthopedics can improve the efficiency of correction and achieve good results. In this paper, from the two aspects of patients and appliances, we analyzed the factors that affect the curative effect of class II malocclusion functional orthopedics and deeply analyzed the therapeutic mechanism of functional appliances to guide clinical treatment. The results of the literature review show that the peak period of growth and development is the best period for the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion. For patients with a vertical growth type, it is recommended to use a high head cap traction appliance to prevent the lower jaw from rotating backward and downward, and functional appliances such as titanium plates or implant nail-assisted anchorage can effectively reduce the lip inclination of the lower anterior teeth. In addition, compared with the traditional functional appliance, digital and personalized transparent braces are not only more aesthetically pleasing, comfortable and beneficial to periodontal health but also have many orthopedic appliances advantages, such as two-stage fusion, better incisor torque and vertical control of the posterior teeth, and can solve the problems of anterior interference and lateral deficiency while leading. With the development of digital orthodontics, transparent appliances have become an important developmental direction for functional appliances, but there are few related studies, and more clinical studies are needed to confirm their efficacy.

Key words: adolescents, Class II malocclusion, malocclusion, growth pattern, functional appliances, transparent retainer, growth pattern, anchorage, digital, periodontal health

中图分类号:

R783.5

汪慧霞,李沛霖,赵志河. 青少年骨性Ⅱ类错颌功能矫形疗效的影响因素[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2020, 28(2): 112-117.

WANG Huixia,LI Peilin,ZHAO Zhihe. Influencing factors of functional orthopedic appliances on skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion in adolescents[J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2020, 28(2): 112-117.

参考文献 38

[1]	Rogers K, Campbell PM, Tadlock L , et al. Treatment changes of hypo-and hyperdivergent Class II Herbst patients[J]. Angle Orthod, 2018,88(1):3-9.
[2]	Elfeky HY, Fayed MS, Alhammadi MS , et al. Three-dimensional skeletal, dentoalveolar and temporomandibular joint changes produced by Twin Block functional appliance[J]. J Orofac Orthop, 2018,79(4):245-258.
[3]	Van Der Plas MC, Janssen KI, Pandis N , et al. Twin block appliance with acrylic capping does not have a significant inhibitory effect on lower incisor proclination[J]. Angle Orthod, 2017,87(4):513-518.
[4]	Stamenković Z, Raičković V, Ristić V . Changes in soft tissue profile using functional appliances in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion[J]. Srp Arh Celok Lek, 2015,143(1/2):12-15.
[5]	Drosen C, Bock NC, Von Bremen J , et al. Long-term effects of Class II Herbst treatment on the pharyngeal airway width[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2018,40(1):82-89.
[6]	Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S . Predictive value of masseter muscle thickness and bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment: a prospective controlled study[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2015,37(6):570-577.
[7]	Kang YL, Franchi L, Manton DJ , et al. A cephalometric study of the skeletal and dento-alveolar effects of the modified Louisiana State University activator in Class II malocclusion[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2018,40(2):164-175.
[8]	Khoja A, Fida M, Shaikh A. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the twin block appliance in subjects with Class II, division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages[J]. Dental Press J Orthod, 2016,21(3):73-84.
[9]	Zymperdikas VF, Koretsi V, Papageorgiou SN , et al. Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2016,38(2):113-126.
[10]	Candir M, Kerosuo H . Mode of correction is related to treatment timing in Class II patients treated with the mandibular advancement locking unit (MALU) appliance[J]. Angle Orthod, 2017,87(3):363-370.
[11]	Perinetti G, Primožič J, Furlani G , et al. Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances alone or in combination with multibracket appliances: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Angle Orthod, 2015,85(3):480-492.
[12]	Souki BQ, Vilefort PLC, Oliveira DD , et al. Three-dimensional skeletal mandibular changes associated with Herbst appliance treatment[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2017,20(2):111-118.
[13]	Herrera-Sanches FS, Henriques JF, Janson G , et al. Class II malocclusion treatment using Jasper Jumper appliance associated to intermaxillary elastics: a case report[J]. Dental Press J Orthod, 2013,18(2):22-29.
[14]	Koretsi V, Zymperdikas VF, Papageorgiou SN , et al. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2015,37(4):418-434.
[15]	Nakayama T, Sekiya T, Satomi M , et al. Influence of posterior cranial base growth on the therapeutic effect of bite jumping appliance[J]. Orthod Waves, 2017,76(4):215-220.
[16]	Michelogiannakis D, Rossouw PE, Fishman LS , et al. A cephalometric comparison of treatment effects and predictors of chin prominence in Class II division 1 and 2 malocclusions with forsus fatigue-resistant fixed functional appliance[J]. J World Fed Orthod, 2018,7(1):17-23.
[17]	Arreghini A, Trigila S, Lombardo L , et al. Objective assessment of compliance with intra- and extraoral removable appliances[J]. Angle Orthod, 2017,87(1):88-95.
[18]	Giuntini V, Vangelisti A, Masucci C , et al. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance vs the forsus fatigue resistant device in growing Class II patients[J]. Angle Orthod, 2015,85(5):784-789.
[19]	Baysal A, Uysal T . Dentoskeletal effects of twin block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2014,36(2):164-172.
[20]	White DW, Julien KC, Jacob H , et al. Discomfort associated with invisalign and traditional brackets: a randomized, prospective trial[J]. Angle Orthod, 2017,87(6):801-808.
[21]	Lu H, Tang H, Zhou T , et al. Assessment of the periodontal health status in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and Invisalign system: a meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018,97(13):e0248.
[22]	Houle JP, Piedade L, Todescan R , et al. The predictability of transverse changes with invisalign[J]. Angle Orthod, 2017,87(1):19-24.
[23]	Moshiri S, Araújo EA, Mccray JF , et al. Cephalometric evaluation of adult anterior open bite non-extraction treatment with invisalign[J]. Dental Press J Orthod, 2017,22(5):30-38.
[24]	Caprioglio A, Grassi T, Lorusso P , et al. Cephalometric changes after headgear anchored to the deciduous second molars in the early mixed dentition[J]. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 2017,18(1):32-36.
[25]	Patel D, Parekh H, Gupta B , et al. Correction of severe class II skeletal discrepancy with fixed twin block and high pull headgear--a case report[J]. Int J Orthod Milwaukee, 2014,25(4):51-55.
[26]	Lima KJ, Henriques JF, Janson G , et al. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2013,143(5):684-694.
[27]	Spalj S, Mroz Tranesen K, Birkeland K , et al. Comparison of activator-headgear and twin block treatment approaches in class II division 1 malocclusion[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017: 4861924.
[28]	Jones G, Buschang PH, Kim KB , et al. Class II non-extraction patients treated with the forsus fatigue resistant device versus intermaxillary elastics[J]. Angle Orthod, 2008,78(2):332-338.
[29]	Eissa O, El-Shennawy M, Gaballah S , et al. Treatment outcomes of Class II malocclusion cases treated with miniscrew-anchored forsus fatigue fesistant device: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Angle Orthod, 2017,87(6):824-833.
[30]	Turkkahraman H, Eliacik SK, Findik Y . Effects of miniplate anchored and conventional forsus fatigue resistant devices in the treatment of Class II malocclusion[J]. Angle Orthod, 2016,86(6):1026-1032.
[31]	Elkordy SA, Abouelezz AM, Fayed MM , et al. Three-dimensional effects of the mini-implant-anchored forsus fatigue resistant device: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Angle Orthod, 2016,86(2):292-305.
[32]	Manni A, Pasini M, Mazzotta L , et al. Comparison between an Acrylic Splint Herbst and an Acrylic Splint Miniscrew-Herbst for mandibular incisors proclination control[J]. Int J Dent, 2014: 173187.
[33]	Rabie A, Chayanupatkul A, Hdgg U . Stepwise advancement using fixed functional appliances: experimental perspectives[J]. Semin Orthod, 2003,9:41-46.
[34]	Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL . Orthodontics: current principles and techniques[M]. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby, Inc., an affliate of Elsevier Inc, 2011. 478-510.
[35]	Purkayastha SK, Rabie AB, Wong R . Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance[J]. World J Orthod, 2008,9(3):233-243.
[36]	Aras I, Pasaoglu A, Olmez S , et al. Comparison of stepwise vs single-step advancement with the functional mandibular advancer in Class II division 1 treatment[J]. Angle Orthod, 2017,87(1):82-87.
[37]	Trenouth MJ, Desmond S . A randomized clinical trial of two alternative designs of twin-block appliance[J]. J Orthod, 2012,39(1):17-24.
[38]	Parkin NA, Mckeown HF, Sandler PJ . Comparison of 2 modifications of the twin-block appliance in matched Class II samples[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001,119(6):572-577.