基于颌骨和股骨差异的动物实验中种植体骨结合影响因素

doi:10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2021.01.009

口腔疾病防治 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 57-60.DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2021.01.009

基于颌骨和股骨差异的动物实验中种植体骨结合影响因素

唐渝菲¹(),周安琪¹,于晖²,刘珍珍³,张歆缘²,王斌²,张恺文¹,向琳²()

1.口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心四川大学华西口腔医院,四川成都（610041）
2.口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心四川大学华西口腔医院种植科, 四川成都（610041）
3.四川大学华西口腔医院唇腭裂外科,四川成都（610041）

收稿日期:2019-11-13 修回日期:2020-04-16 出版日期:2021-01-20 发布日期:2020-11-18
通讯作者: 向琳
作者简介:唐渝菲,本科,Email: tangyufei420@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(81701007);四川大学华西口腔医院人才队伍建设科研经费(RCDWJS2020-6);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2018SCUH0006);四川大学华西口腔医院基础与应用基础研究项目(RD-02-201902)

Differences in implant osseointegration in the jaw and femur in animal experiments

TANG Yufei¹(),ZHOU Anqi¹,YU Hui²,LIU Zhenzhen³,ZHANG Xinyuan²,WANG Bin²,ZHANG Kaiwen¹,XIANG Lin²()

1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Deptartment of Oral Implantology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
3. Deptartment of Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China

Received:2019-11-13 Revised:2020-04-16 Online:2021-01-20 Published:2020-11-18
Contact: Lin XIANG
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(81701007);Research Funding for Talents Developing, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University(RCDWJS2020-6);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2018SCUH0006);Basic and Applied Basic Research Project of West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University(RD-02-201902)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

颌骨和股骨是基础研究中常用的构建骨缺损或植入种植体的部位。越来越多的研究指出,颌骨和股骨二者在胚胎发育及生长、组织形态学结构以及骨代谢等方面存在较大差异。文献复习结果表明与股骨相比,颌骨的骨膜内成骨方式可能具有更优的成骨能力,同时其内的干细胞增殖能力更强,成骨分化能力更好;但颌骨组织结构的规律性欠佳,成骨细胞成骨矿化能力稍弱,免疫细胞对细胞因子更敏感,这些可能是导致动物实验中颌骨与股骨种植体骨结合存在差异的原因,但其具体机制尚未阐明。

关键词: 牙列缺损, 口腔种植义齿, 骨结合, 骨代谢, 颌骨, 股骨, 胚胎发育, 组织形态学

Abstract:

The jaw and femur are commonly used sites in basic research for modeling bone defects or inserting implants. An increasing number of studies have identified that the jaw and femur indeed show great differences in embryonic development and growth, histomorphology and bone metabolism. A literature review showed that, compared with the femur, the main osteogenic pathway of the jaw may have better osteogenic ability, and its stem cells have better proliferation and osteogenic differentiation ability. However, the jaw structure is less regular, the osteogenic differentiation ability of its osteoblasts is mineralization slightly weak, and the immune cells of the jaw are more sensitive to cytokines. These may be the reasons why the osseointegration of the jaw implant is different from that of the femur in animal experiments, but its specific mechanism has not been clarified.

Key words: dentition defect, oral implant denture, osseointegration, bone metabolism, jaw bone, thigh bone, embryonic development, histomorphology

中图分类号:

唐渝菲,周安琪,于晖,刘珍珍,张歆缘,王斌,张恺文,向琳. 基于颌骨和股骨差异的动物实验中种植体骨结合影响因素[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(1): 57-60.

TANG Yufei,ZHOU Anqi,YU Hui,LIU Zhenzhen,ZHANG Xinyuan,WANG Bin,ZHANG Kaiwen,XIANG Lin. Differences in implant osseointegration in the jaw and femur in animal experiments[J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2021, 29(1): 57-60.

参考文献 20

[1]	Albrektsson T, Chrcanovic B, Östman PO , et al. Initial and long-term crestal bone responses to modern dental implants[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2017,73(1):41-50. doi: 10.1111/prd.12176. DOI URL PMID
[2]	陈江, 陈旭晞, 周麟 . 骨免疫调节机制对种植体骨结合及骨生物材料引导骨再生的影响[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2018,26(10):613-620. doi: CNKI:SUN:GDYB.0.2018-10-002.
	Chen J, Chen XY, Zhou L . The effect of bone immunoregulation mechanism on implant osseointegration and bone regeneration guided by bone biomaterials[J]. J Prev Treat Stomatol Dis, 2018,26(10):613-620. doi: CNKI: SUN: GDYB.0.2018-10-002.
[3]	Fujii Y, Kawase-Koga Y, Hojo H , et al. Bone regeneration by human dental pulp stem cells using a helioxanthin derivative and cell-sheet technology[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2018,9(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-0783-7. DOI URL PMID
[4]	Veselá B, Švandová E, Bobek J , et al. Osteogenic and angiogenic profiles of mandibular bone-forming cells[J]. Front Physiol, 2019,10:124. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00124. DOI URL PMID
[5]	Stocum DL, Roberts WE . Part I: development and physiology of the temporomandibular joint[J]. Curr Osteoporos Rep, 2018,16(4):360-368. doi: 10.1007/s11914-018-0447-7. DOI URL PMID
[6]	Filion TM, Skelly JD, Huang H , et al. Impaired osteogenesis of T1DM bone marrow-derived stromal cells and periosteum-derived cells and their differential in-vitro responses to growth factor rescue[J]. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2017,8(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0521-6. DOI URL PMID
[7]	Repp F, Kollmannsberger P, Roschger A , et al. Coalignment of osteocyte canaliculi and collagen fibers in human osteonal bone[J]. J Struct Biol, 2017,199(3):177-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2017.07. 004. DOI URL PMID
[8]	Cuervo-Lozano CE, Soto-Dominguez A, Saucedo-Cárdenas O , et al. Osteogenesis induced by a three-dimensional bioimplant composed of demineralised bone matrix, collagen, hydroxyapatite, and bone marrow-derived cells in massive bone defects: an experimental study[J]. Tissue Cell, 2018,50:69-78. DOI URL PMID
[9]	Nenda MM, Lewicki M, Mandalunis PM . Histomorphometry of the tibia and mandible of healthy female Wistar rats at different stages of growth[J]. Exp Anim, 2016,65(2):109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2017.12.005. DOI URL PMID
[10]	Maruszewska-Cheruiyot M, Donskow-Lysoniewska K, Piechna K , et al. L4 stage Heligmosomoides polygyrus prevents the maturation of dendritic JAWS II cells[J]. Exp Parasitol, 2019,196:12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2018.10.010. DOI URL PMID
[11]	Lloyd B, Tee B C, Headley C , et al. Similarities and differences between porcine mandibular and limb bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2017,77:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.01.012. DOI URL PMID
[12]	Lee DJ, Kwon J, Current L , et al. Osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stem cells from rat mandible to regenerate critical sized calvarial defect[J]. J Tissue Eng, 2019,10:1543407461. doi: 10.1177/2041731419830427.
[13]	Aghaloo TL, Chaichanasakul T, Bezouglaia O , et al. Osteogenic potential of mandibular vs. long-bone marrow stromal cells[J]. J Dent Res, 2010,89(11):1293-1298. doi: 10.1177/0022034510378427. DOI URL PMID
[14]	Bugueño J, Li W, Salat P , et al. The bone regenerative capacity of canine mesenchymal stem cells is regulated by site-specific multilineage differentiation[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2017,123(2):163-172. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2016.09.011. DOI URL PMID
[15]	Yang X, Jiang J, Zhou L , et al. Osteogenic and angiogenic characterization of mandible and femur osteoblasts[J]. J Mol Histol, 2019,50(2):105-117. doi: 10.1007/s10735-019-09810-6. DOI URL PMID
[16]	Goldberg S, Grynpas MD, Glogauer M . Heterogeneity of osteoclast activity and bone turnover in different skeletal sites[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2016,71:134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.06.026. DOI URL PMID
[17]	Everts V, de Vries TJ, Helfrich MH . Osteoclast heterogeneity: lessons from osteopetrosis and inflammatory conditions[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2009,1792(8):757-765. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.05.004. DOI URL PMID
[18]	Marx RE . Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced avascular necrosis of the jaws: a growing epidemic[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2003,61(9):1115-1117. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00720-1. DOI URL PMID
[19]	Wang J, Meng F, Song W , et al. Nanostructured titanium regulates osseointegration via influencing macrophage polarization in the osteogenic environment[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2018,13:4029-4043. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S163956. DOI URL PMID
[20]	Gong X, Yu W, Zhao H , et al. Skeletal site-specific effects of zoledronate on in vivo bone remodeling and in vitro BMSCs osteogenic activity[J]. Sci Rep, 2017,7:36129. doi: 10.1038/srep36129. DOI URL PMID

基于颌骨和股骨差异的动物实验中种植体骨结合影响因素

Differences in implant osseointegration in the jaw and femur in animal experiments

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	贾璟博,任娟,王小琴. 骨性Ⅰ类错牙合不同垂直骨面型患者下颌横向关系研究[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(9): 617-623.
[2]	刘彦杰,宋勇,陈裕聪,王俊林. 刮除联合敞开术治疗颌骨经典型成釉细胞瘤的疗效观察[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(8): 548-552.
[3]	王科,彭国光,何善志,谭玉莲. 克氏针治疗下颌骨髁突矢状骨折13例回顾性分析[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(7): 474-478.
[4]	王安训. 髁突良性肥大的诊断和治疗[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(6): 361-367.
[5]	闫星泉,南欣荣,张泽君,张琪. 29例Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期双膦酸盐相关颌骨坏死的手术疗效[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(6): 395-399.
[6]	周安琪,刘佳怡,贾懿楠,向琳. Hippo-YAP信号轴介导骨免疫调节种植体骨结合的研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(5): 334-339.
[7]	袁泉. 慢性肾脏病患者的口腔种植治疗[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(3): 145-150.
[8]	林曦,李少冰,丁祥龙,徐淑兰. “盾构术”的临床应用及潜在风险[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(2): 115-118.
[9]	施少杰,刘向东,宋应亮. 降糖药物骨代谢效应及对糖尿病患者牙种植的影响[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(2): 110-114.
[10]	汤剑明,谢宏亮,路璐,李博涵,刘浩男,张国权. 数字化技术引导旋髂深动脉穿支嵌合瓣重建下颌骨复合性缺损[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(11): 766-770.
[11]	金卓华,谢丽丽,李雨阳,姜佳杨,欧燕珍,孟维艳. 咬合过载与种植体周围炎关系的研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(11): 782-786.
[12]	宾志文,王方,侯劲松. 青少年下颌骨缺损修复重建的研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2021, 29(10): 711-715.
[13]	徐鸿玮,韩冰. 颌骨组织工程支架材料机械强度增强方法研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2020, 28(9): 600-606.
[14]	满毅,周楠,杨醒眉. 动态实时导航在口腔种植领域中的临床应用及新进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2020, 28(6): 341-348.
[15]	张丹,曹钰彬,林洁. 下颌骨正颌术后下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉联合帕瑞昔布钠静脉镇痛的临床观察[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2020, 28(5): 303-306.