journal1 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 20-25.doi: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.01.004

Special Issue: 11

• Basic Study • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The influence of the roughness of zirconia ceramic surface on microbial attachment

YU Pei, XUE Jing, ZHANG Xiao-wei, ZHENG Cang-shang   

  1. West China Hospital of Stomatology, State Key Lab of Oral Diseases, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2015-05-21 Online:2016-01-20 Published:2016-01-20
  • Contact: ZHANG Xiao-wei, Email: 13538068558@163.com, Tel: 0086-755-83282000

Abstract: Objective To analyze the influence of the zirconia ceramic surface roughness on microbial attachment. Methods The surface of zirconia ceramics was abraded progressively into three roughness levels of rough, medium rough and smooth surface by silicon carbide sand papers. Then the surface roughness, surface morphology and contact angle of zirconia ceramic were measured by atomic force microscopy and optical contact angle measuring device, which was followed by detecting the adhesive force of different roughness of zirconia ceramic by Streptococcus mutans UA159 preprocessed probe. At last scanning electron microscope and confocal laser scanning microscopy were used to observe biofilm formation after co-culture of zirconia ceramics and Streptococcus mutans. Results For different roughness of zirconia ceramic surface, with the smoother degree of their surfaces, the contact angle decreases step by step, surface energy increases gradually, surface biofilm thickness decreases generally, and adhesive force between Streptococcus mutans and surface of zirconia ceramics decreases by degrees, whereas the biofilm bacteria mass of different roughness of zirconia ceramics does not have statistical difference. Conclusion Zirconia surface roughness affects the adhesion force of Streptococcus mutans which grows with the increase of surface roughness. The biofilm thickness and the mass of microorganisms lessened correspondingly with the decreasing of surface roughness, until it drops to a certain number, from where the biofilm thickness and the mass of microorganisms remains stable.

Key words: Zirconium oxide, Streptococcus mutans, Adhesive force, Surface roughness, Biofilm

CLC Number: 

  • R783.1
[1] Desrousseaux C, Sautou V, Descamps S, et al. Modification of the surfaces of medical devices to prevent microbial adhesion and biofilm formation [J]. J Hosp Infect, 2013,85(2):87-93.
[2] Lemos JA, Quivey RG Jr, Koo H, et al. Streptococcus mutans: a new Gram-positive paradigm? [J]. Microbiology, 2013,159(Pt 3):436-445.
[3] Busscher HJ, van der MeiHC. How do bacteria know they are on a surface and regulate their response to an adhering state[J/OL]. PLoSPathog, 2012,8 (1)[2015-03-02]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22291589/.
[4] Busscher HJ, Rinastiti M, Siswomihardjo W, et al. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials[J]. J Dent Res, 2010,89(7):657-665.
[5] 杨隆强,周乔,刘敏川.变异链球菌粘附机制的研究进展[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2011,38(2):229-232.
[6] Hori K, Matsumoto S. Bacterial adhesion: from mechanism to control[J]. Biochemical Engineering J, 2010,48(3):424-434.
[7] LeeBC, JungGY, KimDJ, et al. Initial bacterial adhesion on resin, titanium and zirconia in vitro[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2011,3(2):81-84.
[8] Taylor RL, Verran J, Lees GC, et al. The influence of substratum topography on bacterial adhesion to polymethylmethacrylate[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 1998,9(1):17-22.
[9] Quirynen M, van der Mei HC, Bollen CM, et al. An in vivo study of the influence of the surface roughness of implants on the microbiology of supra- and subgingivalplaque[J]. J Dent Res, 1993,72(9):1304-1309.
[10] ztürk O, Sudagidan M, Turkan U. Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis on nitrogen ion implanted CoCrMo alloy material[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2007,81(3):663-668.
[11] Preedy E, Perni S, NipicD, et al. Surface roughness mediated adhesion forces between borosilicate glass and gram-positive bacteria[J]. Langmuir, 2014,30(31):9466-9476.
[12] Kantorski KZ, Scotti R, Valandro LF, et al. Surface roughness and bacterial adherence to resin composites and ceramics[J]. Oral Health Prev Dent, 2009,7(1):29-32.
[13] Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, et al. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2006,17(Suppl 2):68-81.
[14] Scheuerman TR, Camper AK, Hamilton MA. Effects of substratum topography on bacterial adhesion[J]. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1998,208(1):23-33.
[15] Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature[J]. Dent Mater, 1997,13(4):258-269.
[16] DeupreeSM,SchoenfischMH. Quantitative method for determining the lateral strength of bacterial adhesion and application for characterizing adhesion kinetics[J]. Langmuir, 2008,24(9):4700-4707.
[17] Razatos A, Ong YL, Sharma MM, et al. Molecular determinants of bacterial adhesion monitored by atomic force microscopy[J]. Proc Natl AcadSci USA, 1998,95(19):11059-11064.
[18] Vassiliki AT, Stuart LC. Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to self-assembled monolayers: effect of surface chemistry and fibrinogen presence[J]. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2002,24(3):217-228.
[1] Yanan LIU,Likai WANG,Sisi LIU,Hui HUI,Haifeng WANG. Comparison of polishing effects of three polishing systems on machinable composite resins [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2019, 27(7): 441-445.
[2] YANG Ting,ZHANG Wanting,LI Beibei,DONG Ying,CAO Hongfei,ZHAO Jin. Distribution of oral Streptococcus mutans and its correlation with dental caries in children of Bortala Mongolian Autonomous Prefecture [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2019, 27(4): 219-225.
[3] WANG Zheng,CHENG Lei,ZHOU Xuedong,REN Biao. Research progress on the mechanism of radiocaries formation [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2019, 27(4): 255-259.
[4] Yi TAN,Sui MAI,Jia LIU,Lisha GU. Antibacterial activity of the nisin-containing single-bond universal adhesive [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2018, 26(9): 557-563.
[5] Ru ZHANG, Lei LEI, Yingming YANG, Tao HU. Regulation mechanism of rnc gene on Streptococcus mutans environmental tolerance and its mechanism [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2018, 26(8): 504-507.
[6] Yang LIU, Yueping ZHAO. Research advances in the correlations between periodontal disease and autophagy [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2018, 26(4): 268-272.
[7] ZHOU Qi,LI Jun-xin,ZHONG Bo,ZHANG Xiao-jie,JIANG Shuang-feng. Comparison of the bacterial community structures in root canals with different severity of infection by metagenomic analysis [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2016, 24(9): 519-523.
[8] TIAN Yuan-yuan,YU Xuan,FANG Hong-zhi,YANG Ying-ming,YANG Hui,HU Tao. Effects of exogenous dextranase and sodium fluoride on Actinomyces viscosus biofilm [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2016, 24(11): 640-644.
[9] Hai-xia LIU,Xuan CHEN,Ling ZOU. An in vitro evaluation of antibacterial properties of 2 pulp capping materials [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2016, 24(10): 578-581.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.