Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (7): 424-427.doi: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2016.07.010

• Cinical Study • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of the value of micro screw implant anchorage in adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion

Hong-juan HAN(),Hao WU,Xiao-hua REN,Fei HUANG   

  1. Department of Stomatology, Sichuan Medical Sciences Academy, Sichuan People’s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
  • Received:2015-11-21 Revised:2016-01-03 Online:2016-07-20 Published:2016-07-20
  • Contact: Hong-juan HAN E-mail:dhjh1981@163.com

Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical application of micro screw implant anchorage in orthodontic treatment of patients with bimaxillary protrusion.Methods A total of 62 cases of orthodontic treatment for adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion deformity were divided into micro screw implant anchorage group (group A, 27 cases) and extraoral anchorage group (group B, 35 cases) according to the different treatment methods.Results The orthodontic treatment time in group A was significantly shorter than that in group B (P < 0.05). The difference of upper lip protrusion, lower lip protrusion, upper lip-E line, lower lip-E line and lip gap before and after the treatment in group A were higher than those in group B (P < 0.05). The difference of the upper incisors protrusion, lower incisors protrusion, the upper central incisors angle, the lower central incisors angle, upper alveolar protrusion and lower alveolar protrusion before and after treatment in group A were greater than those in group B (P < 0.05). Conclusion Micro screw implant anchorage provides satisfactory antitumor effect in orthodontic treatment of patients with bimaxillary protrusion than extraoral anchorage, it is worth in the clinical application.

Key words: Micro screw, Implant anchorage, Bimaxillary protrusion, Extraoral anchorage, Adduction

CLC Number: 

  • R783.5

"

"

组别 上唇突度 下唇突度 上唇-E线 下唇-E 线 唇间隙
A组(n = 27) 3.34 ± 0.39 2.38 ± 0.71 2.83 ± 0.71 2.08 ± 0.70 1.71 ± 0.48
B组(n = 35) 2.02 ± 0.53 1.70 ± 0.38 1.82 ± 0.44 1.59 ± 0.45 1.07 ± 0.54
t 10.78 4.84 6.88 3.35 4.86
P <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 <0.001

"

组别 上切牙突度(mm) 下切牙突度(mm) 上中切牙角(°) 下中切牙角(°) 上牙槽突度(mm) 下牙槽突度(mm)
A组(n = 27) 7.44 ± 0.92 5.92 ± 1.12 16.17 ± 2.20 13.02 ± 2.68 3.89 ± 0.89 2.87 ± 0.80
B组(n = 35) 4.22 ± 0.77 4.05 ± 0.71 11.01 ± 2.47 8.45 ± 1.32 1.80 ± 0.56 1.58 ± 0.48
t 15 8.02 8.53 8.8 11.24 7.85
P <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

"

组别 上颌突度(mm) 下颌突度(mm) SNA角(°) SNB角(°)
A组(n = 27) 0.44 ± 0.15 0.40 ± 0.11 0.93 ± 0.44 0.62 ± 0.29
B组(n = 35) 0.37 ± 0.17 0.33 ± 0.18 0.92 ± 0.38 0.69 ± 0.35
t 1.78 1.9 0.13 -0.84
P 0.08 0.062 0.901 0.403
[1] 欧阳仲夫, 杜熹 . 微种植体支抗与口外弓支抗应用于成年女性安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错颌畸形的矫治效果[J]. 广东牙病防治, 2013,21(4):203-207.
[2] Oh YH, Park HS, Kwon TG . Treatment effects of microimplant-aided sliding mechanics on distal retraction of posterior teeth[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011,139(4) : 470-481.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.037 pmid: 21457858
[3] 林铭, 王大为 . 成人双颌前突错畸形患者拔牙正畸治疗后颅面软硬组织的变化[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2009,3(4):424-429.
[4] Davarpanah M. 口腔种植学临床操作指南[M]. 严宁, 译. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2005: 10-12.
[5] Lysle EJ, 许天民, 滕起民. Johnston头影测量技术图解手册[M]. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2012: 148-151.
[6] 陈中坚, 宋志芸 . 微种植体支抗在治疗上颌前突中的应用[J]. 口腔医学, 2013,33(11):772-775.
[7] 陈晓波, 牛赟, 张漫 , 等. 双颌前突中国成人拔牙正畸治疗后唇组织变化预测方法初探[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2013,29(10):959-963.
[8] 刘黎 . 双颌前突病例口外弓支抗矫治前后软硬组织的改变[J]. 中国实用医药, 2014,9(33):44-45.
[9] 郑学汜 . 自攻型与助攻型微螺钉支抗种植体在双颌前突患者中应用效果比较[J]. 中国临床医生, 2013,41(10):28-29.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1089.2013.10.010
[10] 季清皎, 刘忠汉, 郑刚 , 等. 微螺钉种植支抗在压低上颌磨牙中的临床应用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2013,29(9):854-856.
[11] 许志强, 史建陆, 任继业 , 等. 钛合金/不锈钢微植体支抗稳定性的组织学研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2012,28(5):574-577.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2012.05.08
[12] 沈绍莹, 张晓蓉 . 种植支抗在上颌骨矫形治疗中的应用研究[J]. 云南医药, 2012,33(5) : 482.
[13] 张君孝, 李藏珍, 乔鸣芳 , 等. 双颌前突正畸拔牙矫治与外科根尖下截骨术矫治的比较[J]. 广东牙病防治, 2012,20(4):184-190.
[14] Christian SR, Richard M . Three-dimensional soft-tissue and hard- tissue changes in the treatment of bimaxillaryprotrusion[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2013,144(2):218-228.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.018 pmid: 23910203
[15] 靳爱萍, 胡晓聪, 黄月燕 . 微型种植体支抗在口腔正畸中的应用[J]. 中国美容医学, 2011,21(6):1003-1004.
[16] 倪密, 陈文静 . 微种植体支抗治疗双颌前突患者前后颜面形态改变的研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2014 , 34(4):241-244.
[1] YANG Pingzhu,WEN Xiujie,NIE Xin,ZHAO Qian,WANG Yingying,ZENG Qiuyun,ZHU Lin,Li Jun. Finite element analysis of torque control efficiency of a homemade four-curved auxiliary arch for anterior teeth [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2019, 27(3): 178-184.
[2] Feng WU, Junfang LI, Zhen WANG, Zhenyu NI, Hong HE. Clinical application of new mandibular molar intruding appliance [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2017, 25(8): 523-529.
[3] Yue-ling XIE, Chu-feng LIU. To lower elongation molar with micro implant anchorage nail and Ni-Ti coil spring: a clinical study [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2017, 25(4): 231-234.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.