Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 404-408.doi: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2020.06.012

• Review Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

New progress in the clinical application of GBR membrane materials

REN Lizhi1,SUN Rui2()   

  1. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanxi Medical University and Hospital of Stomatology, Taiyuan 030001, China
    2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanxi Provincial People′s Hospital, Taiyuan 030012, China
  • Received:2019-05-27 Revised:2019-12-29 Online:2020-06-20 Published:2020-05-28
  • Contact: Rui SUN E-mail:ruidoctor@163.com

RichHTML

6

PDF (PC)

30

Abstract:

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) barrier membranes are of great significance for the reconstruction of the health and function of different periodontal tissues. Biocompatibility, spatial maintenance, closure, controllability and biological activation are the main criteria that should be met by these membranes. Artificial barrier membrane biomaterials can be divided into synthetic polymer materials, natural polymer materials and metals. According to their degradation characteristics, these membranes can be divided into two categories, absorbable and nonabsorbable membranes. GBR used for horizontal bone increments can be used to treat various types of bone defects, including the treatment of bone fenestration and bone cracking. The use of a non-absorbable e-PTFE membrane or absorbable collagen membrane can achieve the expected effect. However, for incremental or vertical bone growth at the alveolar crest, the use of this membrane is very challenging and requires good strength to maintain the osteogenic space. This space can be enhanced with e-PTFE or d-PTFE membranes with stable morphology, or absorbable membranes can be covered with titanium plates or meshes to achieve vertical bone increments. Currently, bioactive membranes, digital 3D-printed titanium membranes and piezoelectric active biological membranes are research hotspots. In future research, the biological activation of these membranes will be further improved, which will promote the development of artificial membranes in the next stage.

Key words: guided bone regeneration, barrier membrane, biological activated membrane, digital 3D printing of titanium membrane, piezoelectric biofilm, horizontal bone regeneration, vertical bone regeneration

CLC Number: 

  • R78
[1] Elgali I, Omar O, Dahlin C , et al. Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2017,12(2):14-21.
[2] Hoornaert A, Arros C, Heymann M , et al. Biocompatibility, resorption and biofunctionality of a new synthetic biodegradable membrane for guided bone regeneration[J]. Biomed Mater, 2016,11(4):045012.
doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/11/4/045012
[3] Won JY, Park CY, Bae JH , et al. Evaluation of 3D printed PCL/PLGA/â-TCP versus collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in a beagle implant model[J]. Biomed Mater, 2016,11(3):13-55.
[4] Kim S, Hwang Y, Kashif M , et al. Evaluation of bone regeneration on polyhydroxyethyl-polymethyl methacrylate membrane in a rabbit calvarial defect model[J]. In Vivo, 2016,30(1):87-91.
[5] Herzberg R . Vertical guided bone regeneration for a single missing tooth span with titanium-reinforced d-PTFE membranes: clinical considerations and observations of 10 consecutive cases with up to 36 months follow-up[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2017,37(6):893-900.
doi: 10.11607/prd.3380
[6] Hoornaert A, D′Arros C, Heymann MF , et al. Biocompatibility, resorption and biofunctionality of a new synthetic biodegradable membrane for guided bone regeneration[J]. Biomed Mater, 2016,11(4):12-22.
[7] Won JY, Park CY, Bae JH , et al. Evaluation of 3D printed PCL/PLGA/â-TCP versus collagen membranes for guided bone regeneration in a beagle implant model[J]. Biomed Mater, 2016,11(5):13-24.
[8] Ma S, Adayi A, Liu Z , et al. Asymmetric collagen/chitosan membrane containing minocyclineloaded chitosan nanoparticles for guided bone regeneration[J]. Sci Rep, 2016,6(5):18-22.
[9] Pourhaghgouy M, Zamanian A, Shahrezaee M , et al. Physicochemical properties and bioactivity of freeze-cast chitosan nanocomposite scaffolds reinforced with bioactive glass[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2016,11(5):180-186.
[10] Huang D, Niu L, Li J , et al. Reinforced chitosan membranes by microspheres for guided bone regeneration[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2018,81(1):195-201.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.03.006
[11] Xu S, Chen X, Yang X , et al. Preparation and in vitro biological evaluation of octacalcium phosphate/bioactive glass-chitosan/alginate composite membranes potential for bone guided regeneration[J]. Biomaterials, 2015,13(3):46-65.
[12] Hasegawa H, Masui S, Ishihata H . New microperforated pure titanium membrane created by laser processing for guided regeneration of bone[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2018,11(2):16-17.
[13] Rakhmatia YD, Ayukawa Y, Jinno Y , et al. Micro-computed tomography analysis of early stage bone healing using micro-porous titanium mesh for guided bone regeneration: preliminary experiment in a canine model[J]. Odontology, 2017,35(4):46-77.
[14] Sekiguchi H, Uchida K, Matsushita O , et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor fused with tandem collagen-binding domains from clostridium histolyticum collagenase ColG increases bone formation[J]. BioMed Res Int, 2018,24(2):19-20.
[15] Spinell T, Saliter J, Hackl B , et al. In-vitro cytocompatibility and growth factor content of GBR/GTR membranes[J]. Dent Mater, 2019,35(7):963-977.
[16] Caballe-Serrano J, Abdeslam-Mohamed Y, Munar-Frau A , et al. Adsorption and release kinetics of growth factors on barrier membranes for guided tissue/bone regeneration: a systematic review[J]. Arch Oral biol, 2019,100(6):57-68.
[17] Bai L, Ji P, Li X , et al. Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed individualized Ti-mesh (membrane) for alveolar bone defects[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2019,44(3):18-23.
[18] Tandon B, Blaker JJ, Cartmell SH . Piezoelectric materials as stimulatory biomedical materials and scaffolds for bone repair[J]. Acta Biomater, 2018,73:1-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.026
[19] Ehterami A, Kazemi M, Nazari B , et al. Fabrication and characterization of highly porous barium titanate based scaffold coated by Gel/HA nanocomposite with high piezoelectric coefficient for bone tissue engineering applications[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2018,79(3):195-202.
[20] Shokrollahi H, Salimi F, Doostmohammadi A . The fabrication and characterization of barium titanate/akermanite nano-bio-ceramic with a suitable piezoelectric coefficient for bone defect recovery[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2017,74(3):365-370.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.024
[21] Yu P, Ning C, Zhang Y , et al. Bone-inspired spatially specific piezoelectricity induces bone regeneration[J]. Theranostics 2017,7(13):3387-3397.
[22] Mandracchia B, Gennari O, Bramanti A , et al. Labelfree quantification of the effects of lithium niobate polarization on cell adhesion via holographic microscopy[J]. J Biophotonics, 2018,11(8):67-98.
[23] Bai Y, Dai X, Yin Y , et al. Biomimetic piezoelectric nanocomposite membranes synergistically enhance osteogenesis of deproteinized bovine bone grafts[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2019,14(3):15-26.
[24] Tandon B, Blaker JJ, Cartmell SH . Piezoelectric materials as stimulatory biomedical materials and scaffolds for bone repair[J]. Acta Biomaterialia, 2018,73(2):35-60.
[25] Caballe-Serrano J, Munar-Frau A, Ortiz-Puigpelat O , et al. On the search of the ideal barrier membrane for guided bone regeneration[J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2018,10(5):e477-e483.
[26] Soldatos NK, Stylianou P, Koidou VP , et al. Limitations and options using resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes for successful guided bone regeneration[J]. Quintessence Int, 2017,48(2):131-147.
[27] Urban I . Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation: new perspectives[M]. Berlin: Quintessenz Verlags GmbH, 2017: 117-118.
[1] WANG Yamin,ZHOU Zhen,DAO Junfeng,CHEN Qiyue,LIU Wenjing,SONG Guangbao. Evaluation of the effect of concentrated growth factor in guided bone regeneration in maxillary anterior tooth defects [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2020, 28(4): 236-240.
[2] Tao LUO, Ling ZOU. Research progress in applications used for guided tissue regeneration in endodontic surgery [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2018, 26(3): 189-194.
[3] Haibin LU, Lei WAN, Mingdeng RONG, Xueyang ZHANG, Yuan SU. Clinical effects of combined application of Er: YAG laser and guided bone regeneration in treatment of peri-implantitis [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2017, 25(7): 430-434.
[4] XU Jing. The influence of the impacted mandibular third molar extraction on the distal periodontal tissue of the mandibular second molar [J]. journal1, 2016, 24(1): 11-14.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] WU Hongyu,MA Xiaoxin,LU Haixia,FENG Xiping,GU Qin,YE Wei,XIE Yingxin,XIE Danshu,WANG Wenji. Investigation of dental caries and periodontal conditions in maintenance hemodialysis patients[J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2020, 28(5): 313 -317 .
[2] ZHOU Tao,WU Peiyao,YANG Yuqing,CAO Zhiwei,XIE Liang. Research progress on the distribution of primary cilia and related signaling pathways involved in odontogenesis[J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2020, 28(5): 318 -321 .
[3] ZOU Xiaolong,CHEN Yuan,WANG Yan,WANG Jiantao. Research progress on animal models of oral mucositis caused by radiotherapy and chemotherapy[J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2020, 28(5): 322 -326 .
[4] WANG Mengxi,ZHANG Bo,LI Yong,ZHANG Xinduo,GE Lifei,CHANG Zhiqiang. The harm and protective measures of facial occupational exposure of dental medical and nursing personnel[J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2020, 28(5): 327 -330 .
[5] ZHANG Sui,HE Dongning. Current status of immediate implant placement in the aesthetic zone of the anterior teeth[J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2020, 28(5): 331 -335 .
[6] ZHANG Haifeng,NAN Xinrong,HUA Yongqing. Research progress on the consistency and evaluation factors of cervical lymphatic metastasis in early tongue cancer[J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2020, 28(5): 336 -340 .
[7] YE Qingsong, HU Fengting, LUO Lihua, Maria Troulis. Research and application of stem cell-derived exosomes in regenerative medicine[J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2020, 28(1): 1 -10 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2020, 28(2): 68 .
[9] TAO Qian,HE Yue,LIU Bing,HOU Jinsong,NAN Xinrong,ZHANG Bin,ZHANG Leitao,QIAO Bin. Expert consensus on marsupialization of cystic lesions of the jaw[J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2020, 28(2): 69 -72 .
[10] LIU Chuanxia,FU Ji,HAO Yilong,HE Hong,CHEN Qianming. Management strategy of oral mucosal diseases during the epidemic of Corona Virus Disease 2019[J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2020, 28(3): 178 -183 .

Copyright © Editorial Board of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Address:Guangzhou City Jiangnan Road South 366, Editorial office ofJournal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, zip code: 510280　Fax:020-34304115　E-mail：kqjbfz@vip.126.com

Supported by:Beijing Magtech

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.