Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (8): 515-518.DOI: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2017.08.009

• Cinical Study • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical evaluation of retention strength of two different adhesive systems on glass fiber-reinforced posts

Yunting FU(), Hongwen LI(), Ruitian DU, Xiaoyan WANG, Jing JIANG, Senqing LIU   

  1. Department of Stomatology, Shenzhen Longgang E.N.T. hospital,Shenzhen Key Laboratory of E.N.T. Shenzhen 518172 China
  • Received:2017-03-12 Revised:2017-04-19 Online:2017-08-20 Published:2018-09-03

两种不同粘接系统在玻璃纤维桩修复中的临床效果

傅云婷(), 李红文(), 杜瑞钿, 王晓彦, 姜晶, 刘森庆   

  1. 深圳市龙岗区耳鼻咽喉医院口腔科,深圳市耳鼻咽喉研究所,广东深圳(518172)
  • 作者简介:

    作者简介:傅云婷,主治医师,硕士,Email:forteen82@163.com

  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81501573);深圳市重点实验室项目(ZDSYS201506050935272)

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of two different resin cements on the glass fiber-reinforced posts. Methods One hundred and thirty-six teeth were randomly divided into two groups, with sixty-eight in each. Group A used Multilink N self-etch system and group B used RelyX Unicem self-adhesive system to bond fiber posts. Follow-up examinations took place at 6, 12 and 24 months after the placement. Results The success ratios of two groups were all 97% above and there was no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Multilink N self-etch system and RelyX Unicem self-adhesive system all have good effect on glass fiber-reinforced posts bonding.

Key words: Fiber-reinforced post, Microleakage, Resin cement, Self-etch, Self-adhesive

摘要:

目的 比较两种不同粘接系统用于玻璃纤维桩核修复的临床效果。方法 选取136颗已行根管治疗的患牙随机分为自酸蚀Multilink N和自粘接RelyX Unicem两组,行玻璃纤维桩 + 全冠修复。分别在修复后进行随访观察,比较两组患牙的临床修复成功率。结果 修复后6、12、24月,两组成功率均在97%以上,且两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论Multilink N自酸蚀树脂水门汀和RelyX Unicem自粘接树脂水门汀用于粘接纤维桩均能获得良好的临床修复效果。

关键词: 纤维桩, 微渗漏, 树脂水门汀, 自酸蚀, 自粘接

CLC Number: