Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 369-374.doi: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2017.06.006

• Cinical Study • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Disc displacement with reduction treated by modified Twin-block

Xinxin HU1(), Yaomin ZHU1(), Pei SHEN2, Xiao LUO1, Liuting HE1, Ying GU1, Chi YANG2   

  1. 1.Department of Stomatology Shenzhen Second People's Hospital The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University. Shenzhen 518000 China
    2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Ninth People's Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Shanghai 200000 China
  • Received:2017-01-19 Revised:2017-03-06 Online:2017-06-20 Published:2018-09-03

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the morphology and position changes of displaced disk with reduction after treatment by modified Twin-block. Methods 19 patients were diagnosed as displaced disk with reduction and they were treated with modified Twin-block from July 2015 to June 2016. 28 temporomandibular joints (TMJ) of these patients were included in the analysis. The disk length, disk-condylar distance, and disk-condylar angle were measured with MRI before and after treatment. Paired t-test was used. Disk morphology before and after treatment was also documented and analyzed by Wilcoxon signed rank test. The statistical significance was set at P<0.01.Results 28 TMJ disks were anteriorly displaced with reduction. 24 of them were repositioned while the other 4 were still anteriorly positioned after treatment. The disk length was increased significantly (P<0.01) while the disk-condylar distance and disk-condylar angle were decreased significantly after treatment (P<0.01). The disk morphology as hemiconvex (16) and bi planar (9) were the majority before treatment, while biconcave (16) and biplanar (10) were changed to the larger part after treatment. There was improvement on the disk deformation with a statistical significance (P<0.01). Larger disk-condylar distance, disk-condylar angle and severer deformation of disks were observed in the 4 disks without reposition.Conclusion Modified twin-block is an effective appliance for disk displacement with reduction by repositioning the disk and modifying the disk deformation. However the effect is not good for disks with severer deformation and displacement. Further studies with larger sample and stratified group are still needed.

Key words: Anterior disc displacement with reduction, Modified Twin-block, Magnetic resonance imaging, Disk position, Disk morphology

CLC Number: 

  • R782.05

Figure 1

MRI changes before and after modified Twin-block treatment"

Figure 2

Measurements of disk length, disk-condylar distance, and disk-condylar angle"

Figure 3

Disk configuration"

Table 1

Disk length, disk-condylar distance, and disk-condylar angle before and after treatment (n = 28)"

关节盘长度 (mm) 盘髁距离 (mm) 盘髁角度 (°)
治疗前 10.51 ± 1.33 3.89 ± 0.90 29.18 ± 9.31
治疗后 11.10 ± 1.40 0.95 ± 1.85 6.67 ± 12.28
t -3.56 8.91 9.45
P 0.0014 <0.001 <0.001

Table 2

Disk configuration before and after treatment (n = 28)"

双凹形 双面平滑形 V形 双凸形 折叠形 W P
治疗前 2 9 16 1 0 656.6 <0.001
治疗后 16 10 1 1 0
[1] 马绪臣. 颞下颌关节病的基础与临床[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2000: 120-130.
[2] Nebbe B, Major PW, Prasad NG, et al.Quantitative assessment of temporomandibular joint disk status[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 1998, 85(5): 598-607.
[3] 刘俊杰, 张卫东. 颞下颌关节疾病诊疗手册[M]. 北京:人民军医出版社, 2010: 16.
[4] Arayasantiparb R, Tsuchimochi M.Quantification of disc displacement in internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint using magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Odontology, 2010,98(1): 73-81.
[5] 吕春晓, 陈嵩. 颞下颌关节病的临床诊断与磁共振成像影像诊断的相关性研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2016, 43(1): 47-51.
[6] Pupo YM, Pantoja LL, Veiga FF, et al.Diagnostic validity of clinical protocols to assess temporomandibular disk displacement disorders: a meta-analysis[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2016, 122(5): 572-586.
[7] Drace JE, Enzmann DT.Defining the normal temporomandibular joint: closed-, partially open-, and open-mouth MR imaging of asymptomatic subjects[J]. Radiology, 1990, 177(1): 67-71.
[8] 马志贵, 杨驰, 谢千阳, 等. 功能性矫治器治疗青少年可复性盘移位的MRI评价[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2013, 11(2): 131-135.
[9] Ma X, Fang B, Dai Q, et al.Temporomandibular joint changes after activator appliance therapy: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2013, 24(24): 1184-1189.
[10] Aidar LA, Dominguez GC, Abrahão, et al. Effects of Herbst appliance treatment on temporomandibular joint disc position and morphology: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 136(3): 412-424.
[11] Chavan SJ, Bhad WA, Doshi UH.Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in Twin Block and Bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study[J]. Prog Orthod, 2014, 15(1): 1-7.
[12] Shaefer JR, Riley CJ, Caruso P, et al.Analysis of criteria for MRI diagnosis of TMJ disc displacement and arthralgia[J]. Int J Dent, 2012, 2012: 283163.
[13] Murakami S, Takahashi A, Nishiyama H, et al.Magnetic resonance evaluation of the TMJ disc position and configuration[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 1993, 22(4): 205-207.
[14] Amaral RO, Damasceno NN, de Souza LA, et al. Magnetic resonance images of patients with temporomandibular disorders: prevalence and correlation between disk morphology and displacement[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82(6): 990-994.
[15] Taşkaya-Yilmaz N, Oğütcen-Toller M.Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of temporomandibular joint disc deformities in relation to type of disc displacement[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2001, 59(8): 860-865.
[16] Arayasantiparb R, Tsuchimochi, Mitrirattanakul S.Transformation of temporomandibular joint disc configuration in internal derangement patients using magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Int J Oral Sci, 2012, 9(2): 43-48.
[17] Loreto C, Almeida LE, Trevilatto P, et al.Apoptosis in displaced temporomandibular joint disc with and without reduction: an immunohistochemical study[J]. J Oral Pathol Med, 2011, 40(1): 103-110.
[18] Roh HS, Kim W, Kim YK, et al.Relationships between disk displacement, joint effusion, and degenerative changes of the TMJ in TMD patients based on MRI findings[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2012, 40(3): 283-286.
[19] de Melo DP, Sousa MS, de Andrade FOL, et al. Evaluation of temporomandibular joint disk displacement and its correlation with pain and osseous abnormalities in symptomatic young patients with magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2015, 119(1): 107-112.
[1] DING Fugen,HE Wei,SONG Qinggao. Research progress in evaluating velopharyngeal structures and functions by magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2019, 27(5): 321-326.
[2] Gongyuan LEI, Yilong AI, Wei WEI, Dahong HUANG, Wenping LUO, Peng LI. Construction of the 3D digital models of maxillofacial region based on CT and MRI images fusion [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2017, 25(8): 519-522.
[3] Pin ZHOU, Yang-fei LI. MRI study of temporomandibular joint disc position in asymptomatic volunteers [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2017, 25(4): 239-244.
[4] Yuan QIN, Wei PENG, Song-ling CHEN. The application of functional magnetic resonance imaging technology in oral function research [J]. Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2017, 25(4): 261-265.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.